PRK P. Pauh: Kenapa W. Azizah Patut Ditolak

6 05 2015
Advertisements




Bekas Peguam Anwar, Zul Noordin: W. Azizah Mengakui Anwar Bersalah?

25 02 2015

KENYATAAN MEDIA:

Saya agak pelik dengan permohonan pengampunan keatas Banduan bernama Anwar Ibrahim oleh isterinya Wan Azizah.

Pelik kerana Wan Azizah sendiri tidak hadir memberi keterangan didalam perbicaraan bagi Banduan sebagai saksi alibi. Kalau di Mahkamah pun dia tidak membantu Banduan, mengapa kini dia pula yang sibuk mohon pengampunan bagi Banduan?

Adakah permohonan keampunan yang dikemukakan ini bermakna Wan Azizah mengakui & menerima sabitan kesalahan meliwat terhadap Banduan?

Bagi saya, permohonan Wan Azizah ini wajib ditolak atas alasan:

  1. Permohonan pengampunan keatas Banduan bernama Anwar Ibrahim oleh isterinya Wan Azizah wajib ditolak kerana ianya dibuat tanpa persetujuan dan/ atau pengetahun Banduan sendiri.

Ini kerana Banduan konsisten dgn pendirian tidak mahu membuat permohonan pengampunan!

Adakah Wan Azizah membuat permohonan ini tanpa pengetahuan atau persetujuan Banduan? Kalau benar Wan Azizah membuat permohonan pengampunan ini tanpa pengetahuan atau persetujuan Banduan, ini adalah satu penghinaan terhadap pendirian Banduan tersebut!

  1. Asas kepada sebarang permohonan pengampunan ialah pengakuan salah kpd kesalahan yang disabit, penyesalan atas perlakuan kesalahan itu dan akujanji tidak akan mengulanginya lagi;
  2. Elemen2 ini tidak ada dalam permohonan Wan Azizah maka ianya wajib ditolak;

  3. Sebaliknya Wan Azizah cuba memperkaldaikan institusi pengampunan DiRaja dengan menjadikan alasan “kehakiman tidak telus” sebagai alasan pengampunan. Ini satu penghinaan keatas institusi pengampunan dan wajib ditolak dan dikenakan tindakan sewajarnya!

  4. Permohonan ini juga suatu penghinaan kepada institusi kehakiman yang dilantik dan bernaung dibawah YDP Agong kerana menjadikan alasan “kehakiman tidak telus” sebagai alasan permohonan pengampunan;

  5. Kebiasaanya hanya mereka yang dijatuhkan hukuman mati atau penjara sepanjang hayat akan memohon pengampunan bagi tujuan pengurangan hukuman. Bagi seorang yang disabitkan kesalahan meliwat dan dijatuhkan hukuman penjara 5 tahun adalah sesuatu yang agak “luar biasa” untuk memohon pengampunan atas hukuman, apatah lagi bagi Banduan ini yg selalu melalak slogan “Lawan Tetap Lawan”. Adakah keluarga membuat permohonan pengampunan kerana Banduan dikatakan tidak mampu melawan nyamuk didalam penjara spt yang diadukan oleh isterinya Wan Azizah?

Pada saya, adalah lebih baik dan afdhal bagi Banduan memohon keampunan daripada Allah setelah dia memohon maaf secara terbuka & peribadi kepada Saiful Bukhari Azlan!

Zulkifli Noordin
Rabu
6 Jamadil Awal 1436
25 Feb 2015





Kajang Waterland, Malaysia’s Biggest Natural Water Park

16 11 2014

Kajang





Felda wins defamation suit against Wan Azizah, two others

17 10 2014

KUALA LUMPUR: The Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) and its investment company have won a defamation suit against PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and two others.

High Court Judicial Commissioner Kamaludin Md Said held that Felda as a statutory body had the right to sue the parties under Section 15 (1) of the Land Development Act 1956.

“There is a statutory provision for the plaintiff (Felda) on the right to sue. Therefore, Felda can institute the civil proceedings (against the defendants). It can sue to protect its reputation,” he said after dismissing the preliminary issue raised in the matter.

Judicial Commissioner Kamaludin said Felda is entitled to enter judgment on liability in the civil dispute.

“Only Parliament, and not the court, can take away those rights (to sue),” he said.

JC Kamaludin ordered a senior assistant registrar to assess costs as well as aggravated and exemplary damages to be awarded to the plaintiffs for libel and malicious falsehood.

JC Kamaludin also granted an injunction to restrain the defendants from repeating the defamatory words.

“Apology is not allowed,” he added.

The defendants’ lead counsel Francis Pereira said that his clients had on Sept 30 admitted liability in respect of two defamatory articles.

Felda was represented by lead counsel Datuk Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin and lawyer Cheng Mai.

Felda had on Aug 16, 2010 sued Dr Wan Azizah, her then deputy Dr Syed Husin Ali and four others for RM200mil over claims that the statutory body was bankrupt.

In the defamation claim, the plaintiffs – Felda and its investment company Felda Global Ventures Holdings Sdn Bhd – sued six defendants for false allegations over the process of buying the Felda building.

Suara Keadilan publisher Pelita Koridor Sdn Bhd, its printer Percetakan NPK Sdn Bhd, its editor Dzulkarnain Taib and its writer Rusnizam Mahat are the other four defendants.

On Oct 26, 2010 Felda obtained judgment-in-default-of-appearance in the suit against Suara Keadilan’s publisher and printer.

Dzulkarnain had on Sept 30 had apologised to Felda and undertake to refrain from making any further allegations.

Felda has contended that it sued PKR as the party is responsible for the publication of the monthly newspaper Suara Keadilan which carried the two allegedly defamatory articles in its June 22-29, 2010 edition.





Sultan Selangor Dukacita PKR, DAP Engkar – Kenyataan Akhbar Istana

8 09 2014
(Photo credit to Jiwa Paradox.)

(Photo credit to Jiwa Paradox.)

(Photo credit to Jiwa Paradox)

(Photo credit to Jiwa Paradox)





Now It Is Wan Azizah vs Azmin, What A Joke – Comic

21 08 2014

Khalid 8





TMI Suruh Khalid Derhaka Kepada Sultan?

19 08 2014

Insider 6

Above is an article by The Malaysian Insider (TMI):

It wrote:

“All signs point to the fact that Khalid has lost his job. That he should go. He should inform the state ruler of that immediately and not wait to seek an audience. Why should Selangor suffer a week or two more with a menteri besar in name but without any support?” – TMI

So, is TMI pushing Tan Sri Khalid to quit immediately without a royal audience?

Apart from that, TMI also wrote:

“But why wait for the sultan to decide his fate? Why hide with palace protocol?” – TMI

Is TMI trying to accused Tan Sri Khalid as being power crazy and forcing Tan Sri Khalid to go against the Sultan’s orders?

Selangor MB, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim had tried to seek an audience with the Sultan who is overseas at the moment to inform the Sultan about what is happening and to seek for the Sultan’s advice.

But the Sultan of Selangor told Khalid to wait until he comes back, and that is why Tan Sri Khalid is still the MB of Selangor; because the Sultan says so.

What ever Tan Sri Khalid wants to do next, he must first seek an audience with the Sultan.

He obeys the Sultan’s orders and is not trying to force the Sultan like what Anwar Ibrahim, his gang and some of TMI’s commentators are doing – forcing the Sultan of Selangor to accept Wan Azizah only because Anwar wants his wife to be the MB.

Remember that Tan Sri Khalid gave his pledge on 10 Aku Janji or undertakings and he is keeping his words.

After all these jokes started by Anwar’s Kajang Move, I now admire and respect Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.

BvTnrf5CEAAs_y2








%d bloggers like this: