Tag: Tony Pua
Is Muhyiddin Still “A Malay First”?
“I am a Malay first!” stated Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin as he accused DAP’s Parliamentary Leader, Lim Kit Siang’s statement as “to put a wedge between the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister.”
That happened six years ago when Tan Sri Muhyiddin was still the Deputy Prime Minister and the, “I am a Malay first” was regarded as a heroic statement by the members of UMNO, in accordance with UMNO’s spirit of “alif, ba, ta (agama, bangsa dan tanahair)” or religion, race and nation.
Below is the video of his statement originally released by MalaysiaKini’s KiniTV.
But now the former Deputy Prime Minister seems to change his mind.
He joined Tun Dr. Mahathir to team up with the enemies of UMNO who are against Islam, the Malay rights and the Federal Constitution such as Lim Kit Siang, Tony Pua, Teresa Kok, Tian Chua, Ambiga Sreenevasan, Maria Chin, and others.
By teaming up with those enemies of UMNO, he is now against his own party and what he said six years ago.
When he said, “I am a Malay first”, it automatically means he is also saying that he is a Muslim first because according to the interpretation of Malay in the Clause 2 of the Article 160 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia:
“…“Malay” means a person who professes the religion of Islam, habitually speaks the Malay language, conforms to Malay custom…”
So how could he becomes teammates with Lim Kit Siang and happily sharing a couch with him?
Has Tan Sri Muhyiddin forgotten that Lim Kit Siang had rudely made a malicious accusation that a verse from the Quran, the verse 120 of Surah Al-Baqarah caused religious hatred and blamed JAKIM for using the verse in a Khutbah Jumaat?
By teaming up with Lim Kit Siang who is clearly against Islam and the Malay rights, Tan Sri Muhyiddin is now against his own principles of Malay first.
His other new teammate, Tony Pua among others had humiliated the law and principals of Islam by making fun of the Islamic view regarding Valentines Day.
In his Chinese New Year video, Tony Phua again makes fun of the Muslims by mocking a Saudi Arabian Muslim in a very humiliated ways.
Another new teammate of Tan Sri Muhyiddin, Teresa Kok had ordered the Jawi script on road signs of Jalan Bukit Bintang and Jalan Taman Seputeh to be abolished.
Jawi is the original script of the Malay language, and the Malay Language is the national Language according to the Article 152 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
(1) The national language shall be the Malay language and shall be in such script…
Tian Chua who is another of Tan Sri Muhyiddin’s new teammate, on February 2013 made a malicious and uncalled comment about the Lahad Datu standoff saying that the death of ten policemen and soldiers from our PDRM and ATM including nine Malays who were protecting Lahad Datu was just a “sandiwara UMNO” or a theatrical staged by UMNO as a conspiracy to distract and scare the people because of the general election.
Ambiga and Maria Chin are both Bersih leaders that organised illegal demonstrations against the government, creating havoc and disorder and promoting the anarchy ideology which is against the principals of the Malay and Islam.
They, who are also behind COMANGO, are fighting for the LGBT rights which is against Islam apart from fighting for parts of the Islamic laws to be abolished.
COMANGO demands Malaysia to:
- Sign the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights (ICCPR) which is against the Articles 3(1) and 11(4) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
- Sign the International Covenant on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) which is against Article 153 of the Federal Constitution that gives special rights and position of the Malays and the Bumiputras (indigenous people of the Sabah and Sarawak).
- Sign SOGI Rights (Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity) to legalise LGBTIQ which is against Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution and also the Malaysian law.
- Demands that some enactments of the Syariah Law to be abolished which is against Article 3(1) and against the second principle of the Rukun Negara that says, “Loyalty to the king and country,” because the king is the protector of Islam.
What Bersih and COMANGO are fighting for are against the Federal Constitution as Islam is the religion of the Federation.
Tan Sri Muhyiddin whom once claimed to be a Malay first, whose religion must be Islam, has now become teammates with people who are against Islam and the special rights and position of the Malays and the Bumiputras.
Maybe now he has changed his mind about being a Malay first for, on the 27th of February 2016, he made a new statement:
“Ketepikan sentimen kaum, agama dan ideologi untuk ke arah mewujudkan sebuah kerajaan yang adil, amanah dan berintegriti.”
Isn’t it weird that just because he is against the Prime Minister, his personal principals and views have changed and he is now teammates to the people who are trying to destroy his party that had once made him a Deputy Prime Minister?
Is Lim Kit Siang more Malay and Islamic than PM Najib to the former Deputy Prime Minister?
His actions hurt the Malays and UMNO members who had voted for him.
Kalau marahkan nyamuk jangan bakar kelambu, jangan sampai menang sorak, kampung tergadai.
Is Muhyiddin Racist?
Please watch the video of Tan Sri Muhyiddin’s speech on Article 10 of the Federal Constitution : “Muhyiddin: Tiada Pihak Boleh Persoalkan Pembentukan Negara Malaysia (Video)”.
The opposition parties are very busy complaining about everything that they can think of instead of working to solve the problems in Selangor, Penang and Kelantan.
Now they and some human rights activists are fighting for a total freedom of speech because they want to be free to say everything they wish, including matters related to sensitive issues such as the Federal Constitution, the Royal Institution and others.
Like when Lim Kit Siang humiliate the Khutbah Jumaat that reminded the Muslims of the Surah Al-Baqarah: verse 120.
Tony Pua also humiliated JAKIM’s Khutbah Jumaat (about Valentine’s day.)
Hannah Yeoh went against the Sultan of Selangor’s decree on Allah issue as well as Selangor Non-Islamic Religions (Control of Propagation Among Muslims) Enactment 1988, and Article 11(4) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
PAS’s Wan Ji made lots of rude statements against the teaching of Islam, Islamic authorities and the Royal Institution.
And lots of human rights activists do not respect the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.
They use Article 10 of the Federal Constitution as the reason why they are free to say anything they wish; claiming that Article 10 Clause 1 (a) granted them total freedom of speech’.
Article 10 Clause 1 (a) says:
“every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression”
Is it true that the Article 10 of the Federal Constitution gives us a total freedom of speech?
No, because Article 10 of the Federal Constitution says:
“10. (1) Subject to Clauses (2), (3) and (4)—
(a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression;”
That means Article 10 (1) of the Federal Constitution is subjected to Clauses (2), (3) and (4).
And Clause 2 (a) of the Article 10 says:
“Parliament may by law impose— on the rights conferred by paragraph (a) of Clause (1), such restrictions as it deems necessary or expedient in the interest of the security of the Federation or any part thereof, friendly relations with other countries, public order or morality and restrictions designed to protect the privileges of Parliament or of any Legislative Assembly or to provide against contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to any offence;”
So, the oppositions and human rights activists who support them, only use Article 10 (1) (a) and purposely ignore Article 10 (1) which says that the article is subjected to Clauses (2), (3) and (4).
That means, they just skipped the part of the article that says there are restrictions to freedom of speech.
That is wrong because we cannot use only a part of an article of the Federal Constitution and skip the rest of the article as we wish.
They did the same when they refer to Article 11 (1) of the Federal Constitution by purposely leaving the part saying, “subject to Clause (4), to propagate it”.
Anyway, freedom of speech that they are fighting for is only a total freedom for them to say what ever they want but not for others.
Does Anwar respect freedom of speech if he wanted to sue the reporter who asked him a question that he is not happy with?
Another example is the issue between the Chief Minister of Penang, Lim Guan Eng and PAS’s Nasruddin Hassan Tantawi.
Is freedom of speech respected by people who always talk about freedom of speech in the above examples?
I am tired of the opposition’s tactics to destroy the stability of our country with the help of those human rights activists who support them.
They must look at themselves before telling others what to do.
They are worse than the pot calling the kettle black.
Tony Pua Hina Khutbah Jumaat?
DAP’s MP of Petaling Jaya Utara, Tony Pua Kiam Wee made a very silly statement in his Facebook page.
On Friday, February 14, 2014, JAKIM’s Friday sermon talked about why Muslims must not celebrate Valentine’s day.
Look at what Tony Pua wrote:
From what he wrote, he clearly try to mock JAKIM especially by writing:
“Oh no. I feel so unclean and immoral now I might just burn in hell.”
May be Tony Pua does not know that Friday sermons are read in the mosques and to be addressed to the Muslims and not to the non-Muslims like him.
Is it fair for a Malaysian politician like Tony Pua to mock other people’s religion especially Islam which is the religion of the Federation?
DAP always talks about Article 11(3) of the Federal Constitution and now what is Tony Pua’s right to interfere with another religion which is not his?
Freedom of Speech?
What would he say if a Muslim politician from UMNO make such an open rude statements to make fun of his religion?
On top of that, Tony Pua had clearly humiliate Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia that says:
“Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.”