Don’t Want Liberalism, Tear Up The Constitution – Another Malicious Distortion Of The Truth From TMI

11 12 2014

Insider 14

In the above article, The Malaysian Insider (TMI) reported that Professor Ebrahim E. I. Moosa who is a South African, made a statement that “Malaysia was a pluralistic and liberal country”.

He made that statement in reply to a question from the audience regarding the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom’s statement, “the teachings of liberalism and pluralism are seen as among the most prevalent forms of insult to Islam”.

TMI wrote that:

“The very idea that Malaysia has accepted, constitutionally or otherwise, the plurality of religious and ethnic communities… it is already on the way to liberalism. You are already on a certain kind of liberalism. It might not be an optimal one, but it is already there” – TMI.

I do not know whether Professor Ebrahim understands the word liberalism and pluralism that were mentioned by Datuk Seri Jamil Khir.

Malaysia does accept “the plurality of religious and ethnic communities” but that does not makes Malaysia ‘a pluralistic and liberal country’; furthermore, Malaysia does not accept pluralism of religion.

“The very idea that Malaysia has accepted the plurality of religious and ethnic communities”, shows that our Rulers, the government and the Malays respect other religions and ethnic communities as how Islam teaches us.

But that does not make us liberal.

Professor Ebrahim also said:

“If you want to get away from liberalism, you need to tear up the Malaysian constitution”  Professor Ebrahim E. I. Moosa – TMI

Tear up the Malaysian Constitution if we do not want liberalism?

I do not know if Professor Ebrahim knows what is he talking about, if he thinks he does, he must be so confused or he must has read the constitution of another country!

And this is a malicious distortion of the truth because as an Islamic country, Malaysia does not accept liberalism because it is against the teaching of Islam.

And there is no such word as ‘liberalism’ in our Federal Constitution.

Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia says:

Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may
be practiced in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.

… and we have Article 11(4) to protect the religion of the Federation:

State law and in respect of the Federal Territories of Kuala
Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.

Islam is the only religion mentioned in the Federal Constitution, and Islam is protected by the Federal Constitution and the state laws.

In fact as the religion of the Federation, Islam is above other religions in Malaysian; and that is against the idea of liberalism that rejects state religion.

Moreover, Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution recognises the Syariah Court.

Now, if the professor does not understand what is liberalism and pluralism, he should ask somebody.

Liberalism is all about total freedom and pluralism is saying that one’s religion is not the sole and exclusive source of truth, and thus the acknowledgement that at least some truths and true values exist in other religions.

When TMI wrote that, the professor said that, “Malaysia was a pluralistic and liberal country”, I wonder if the word “was” is a typo or he used the word, “was” to indicate that Malaysia was once a pluralistic and liberal country but not anymore.

For the record, Malaysia is neither was nor is a pluralistic and liberal country.

History tells us that Malaysia is always an Islamic country even before our independence.

Actually the existing Islamic laws before Merdeka Day are still valid according to Article 162 of the Federal Constitution which says:

Subject to the following provisions of this Article and Article 
163*, the existing laws shall, until repealed by the authority
having power to do so under this Constitution, continue in force
on and after Merdeka Day, with such modifications as may be
made therein under this Article and subject to any amendments
made by federal or State law.

The professor also told us to learn history:

“The first thing to be done, to the many spokespersons who are saying these things, is a quick lesson in Malaysian history… Malaysian history 101… to re-familiarise themselves” -TMI.

Actually the person who needs to learn history is him and most of those who supported the above TMI article!

And above all, since he is not a Malaysian and since he just came to Malaysia, he should not interfere in local issues that he knows nothing about.

He might want to say that as a scholar, he should know better about our Federal Constitution than others including our Federal Constitution experts like Dato’ Naser Disa and Professor Shamrahayu.

But, has he ever read the Federal Constitution and does he know that it takes a lawyer to interpret law and constitution?

I hope that the government can take stern actions on those who make such a malicious distortion of the truth regarding the Federal Constitution of Malaysia including foreigners because our Federal Constitution is the highest law and something like the pillar of our country.

Those ‘scholars’ are bringing bad influences as they being used by certain groups to influence the public into believing something fictitious in order to serve their hidden agendas and this could cause racial and religious disharmony among the people.

And these so called “Muslim scholars” are spreading the ideologies of liberalism and pluralism as the teaching of Islam when these ideologies are actually part of deviant teaching.

Advertisements




PRU 13: PAS Supports Liberalisme And Pluralism?

11 04 2013

Muslims must not supports Liberalism and Pluralism!

 Timbalan Yang Dipertua PAS Kuala Lumpur  Ishak Surin, 75 reciting prayer (doa)  inside the Tokong Mee Thor Gan, Ampang to save the temple together with a monk.

Timbalan Yang Dipertua PAS Kuala Lumpur Ishak Surin, 75 reciting prayer (doa) inside the Tokong Mee Thor Gan, Ampang to save the temple together with a monk. Image from SEL13. com.

PAS YB Nizar Jamaluddin and another Malay man took part in the Teoh Beng Hock Christian candle light vigil. Image from ( http://anakbukitgantang.blogspot.com/2013/04/benarkan-pas-pakatan-memperjuangkan.html )

PAS YB Nizar Jamaluddin and another Malay man took part in the Teoh Beng Hock candle light vigil ceremony. Image from Anakbukitgantang. (http://anakbukitgantang.blogspot.com/2013/04/benarkan-pas-pakatan-memperjuangkan.html )

That is why we should not vote for PAKATAN RAKYAT.
Vote for BARISAN NASIONAL!

 





Anwar Ibrahim, Human Rights and Freedom

7 08 2012

Anwar Ibrahim claims that he fights for the people, freedom and human rights.

But is he really fighting for the people, freedom and human rights?

Demi Rakyat wrote that Anwar said, “Rakyat jangan jadi bodoh, (mesti) merdekakan rakyat. Tidak ada maknanya Islam itu, apabila rakyat tidak ada kebebasan.”

He is telling the people not to be stupid and that the people need to be freed and Islam has no meaning without people’s freedom.

So my questions are:

  1. Who are the people who are stupid and why are they stupid?

  2. Who are the people who needed to be freed by him?

  3. Islam has no meaning without people’s freedom; is Anwar referring to the idea of Liberalism and Pluralism?

People in Malaysia are free to support any political parties, so why is Anwar talking about people need to be freed?

Does Anwar think that people who do not support him as stupid and not free to make the choice?

Is human rights only means supporting Anwar and people who support the government are not free and stupid?

So, how about the rights of the people to support the government?

Does Anwar think that if one wants freedom he must only support PR?

Anwar’s human rights idea is just the same like the LGBT groups who protested at Cick-fil-A restaurants; please click here: ‘Chick-fil-A Hit by Gay Protesters’.

In Islam there is no total freedom, we have to follow the rules in everything we do; the people who practice total freedom in Islam are the Libralist and Pluralist and it is against the teaching of Islam. 

Now whose rights is Anwar Ibrahim fighting for? 





PR, Please Don’t Lie During Ramadhan!

26 07 2012

Muslims should never tell lies, especially during the holy month of Ramadhan.

So, its time for PAS to give true answers to the below questions:

  1. Does PAS follow the Orange Book or the Islamic Law?

  2. Is Malaysia an Islamic country?

    Islam is the religion of the Federation of the Malay States of Malaysia but PAS says that Malaysia is a secular country.

  3. Is PAS teaching their supporters the true Islam or is PAS actually using Islam to win their supporters votes?

    PAS claims that Malaysia is a secular country, told people that supporting UMNO is haram, UMNO is not fighting for Islam and Muslims, let the non-Muslims use the word Allah, said that it is ‘wajib’ to join Bersih 3.0 and a lot of other lies which are actually against the Islamic teaching.

  4. Is Malaysia a secular country?

  5. Did PR plan Bersih 3.0 riot?

  6. Does PAS fight against LGBT?

  7. Does PAS fight against Syiah?

  8. Is there no corruption in PAS and PR?

  9. Do the PAS leaders ever lie to their supporters?

  10. Do PAS leaders trust and really like DAP and PKR?

  11. Is PAS lying about FGVH shares?

    PAS claimed that FGVH will not be profitable and took part in Himpunan Oren but Kedah PAS’s government bought and made lots of profit from FGVH shares.

And some questions to the PKR Muslim leaders:

  1. Did PKR protect the Rights of the Muslims by serving halal and non-halal food together during the dinner with Anwar?

  2. Did PR plan the Bersih 3.0 riotand who started the Bersih 3.0 riot?

  3. Did Anwar signal Azmin to break the barricades during Bersih 3.0?

  4. Do PKR leaders never lie and always tell the truth?

  5. Does PKR support LGBT, Liberalism and Pluralism and the Rights to become murtad?

  6. Will PKR be buying MPs to win the PRU 13?

  7. Is it true that there are lots of corruptions in PR government?

I hope that PAS will not lie during Ramadhan since their leaders claim that PAS is an Islamic party …

Related post:

  1. Does ‘Demi Rakyat’ Supports Gay?

  2. Ustaz Azhar Idrus, A PAS Candidate for PRU 13?

  3. Does PAS Still Like YB Nasharudin?





Is PAS Still An Islamic Party?

28 06 2012

After reading about PAS continues to adhere to PR’s Orange Book from AIDC, I started to think if the name Parti Islam Se-Malaysia still fits PAS.

An Islamic party must follow the Quran and not the Orange Book.

PAS tells the Muslims that PAS follows the Quran and still fights for the Islamic law.

But PAS leaders also made statements that PAS continues to adhere the Orange Book.

Al-Quran is the Muslims’ holy book but the Orange Book has nothing to do with Islam!

So, who are PAS trying to cheat?

PAS supports the LGBT rights, ‘murtad’, liberalism and pluralism fighters.

PAS did not let PAS members join HIMPUN but told them that it is ‘wajib’ to join Bersih 3.0.

And PAS says that everybody has the rights to call their gods Allah.

So how could PAS still claims that they are fighting for Islam?

PAS should be happy when Datuk Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak said that the government will fight against LGBT, Liberalism and Pluralism; but PAS did not support him.

PAS should offer advices, ideas and helps even if PAS does not like Datuk Seri Najib, because Muslims should help each other to protect Islam.

But instead, PAS said bad things towards Datuk Seri Najib for making the promises.

I used to love PKR and PAS because I think that they are Islamic and fair.

But now I know who they actually are.

So, what does the letters P,A and S in PAS really stands for?








%d bloggers like this: