Perlu Sangatkah Parlimen Dibubar Dengan Segera?

[ baca versi jawi di sini ]

Keputusan mesyuarat Majlis Tertinggi (MT) UMNO bahawa pembubaran Parlimen hendaklah diadakan dalam masa terdekat telah mengundang pelbagai reaksi.

Dalam membangkitkan soal banjir, lupakah kita bahawa sebelum wabak Covid-19, peperiksaan SPM dan STPM diadakan pada setiap akhir tahun? Kenapa tiada pula yang bertindak mengadakan perhimpunan untuk membantah?

Bagi saya, masing-masing bebas melontarkan pendapat tetapi kita mesti menghormati Perkara 40(1) Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

Seperti tulisan-tulisan saya di akhbar Utusan Malaysia, pendirian saya tentang hal ini adalah jelas dan tetap.

Kita tidak wajar menangguhkan perkara yang telah ditangguhkan sejak dua tahun yang lalu kerana mandat daripada rakyat adalah amat penting demi menjamin kestabilan politik.

Tiada gunanya kita mempertikaikan keabsahan Perdana Menteri jika kita tidak mahu Perdana Menteri diabsahkan dengan memulangkan mandat kepada rakyat.

Apa gunanya bercakap soal demokrasi jika kita bertindak melengahkan proses demokrasi?

Mengambil contoh peristiwa 1981, apabila Tun Mahathir pertama kali menjadi Perdana Menteri pada bulan Julai tahun tersebut, Tun telah membubar Parlimen hanya sekitar lapan bulan sahaja selepas itu.

Itu ialah tempoh Parlimen tersingkat dalam sejarah negara, iaitu tiga tahun, lapan bulan dan tujuh hari; manakala Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU) diadakan kurang sebulan selepas tarikh pembubaran itu.

Hal ini penting untuk diperhatikan, kerana situasi kita agak mirip situasi 1981 di mana pertukaran Perdana Menteri berlaku bukan melalui PRU.

Begitu juga dalam situasi yang serupa apabila berlaku perubahan kuasa daripada Tun Mahathir kepada Tun Abdullah, dan daripada Tun Abdullah kepada Dato’ Seri Najib; PRU diadakan tidak lama setelah itu.

Perkara ini penting dalam sistem demokrasi moden untuk memastikan setiap perubahan pucuk pimpinan negara mendapat mandat daripada rakyat.

Selari dengan amalan negara sebelum ini, PRU15 sepatutnya diadakan sejak 2020 lagi – iaitu ketika Tan Sri Muhyiddin menjadi Perdana Menteri hasil peralihan kuasa daripada PH kepada PN yang berlaku bukan melalui PRU.

Setahun selepas itu, jawatan Perdana Menteri berubah kepada Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri, sekali lagi tanpa melalui PRU.

Maka mandat hendaklah dikembalikan secepat mungkin agar kedudukan kerajaan dapat diabsahkan.

Kit Siang Akan Pinda Perlembagaan DAP?

Sebagai menjawab kenyataan Perdana Menteri Malaysia, Dato’ Sri Najib Razak bahawa hak-hak orang Melayu akan hilang jika pakatan pembangkang menang dalam Pilihan Raya Umum, Ketua Parlimen DAP, Lim Kit Siang berkata hak orang Melayu tetap terpelihara, malah akan dipertingkatkan jika ‘Pakatan Harapan-Bersatu’ memenangi Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU), seperti yang telah dilaporkan oleh RoketKini.

Kenyataan Lim Kit Siang itu amat lucu, mengarut dan retorik kerana mempertahankan hak-hak istimewa orang Melayu adalah bertentangan dengan Perlembagaan DAP; khasnya pada Fasal II Matlamat 2, 10, 11; bermakna Perlembagaan DAP mesti dipinda terlebih dahulu jika benar DAP mahu mempertahankan hak Melayu! 

Malah, ramai peminpin bukan Melayu DAP dan Pakatan DAP yang gagal berbahasa Melayu dengan baik, pada hal Bahasa Melayu ialah Bahasa Kebangsaan.

Bagaimanakah DAP mahu memelihara hak istimewa orang Melayu jika bangsa Melayu tidak disebut lagi, termasuk di dalam borang rasmi dan semua bangsa mahu dirangkumkan sebagai satu bangsa sahaja?

Menyamaratakan bangsa? No Malays? Tiada lagi Melayu?

Tweet Hannah Yeoh, pemimpin kanan DAP dan speaker Dewan Undangan Negeri Selangor yang mahu menggunakan “Anak Malaysia” sebagai nama kaum di Sijil Kelahiran anaknya.

Bekas aktivis DAP, Tuan Razali Abdul Rahman telah menceritakan bagaimana orang-orang Melayu ditindas oleh kerajaan DAP di Pulau Pinang; itu setakat memerintah negeri, apa lagi kalau DAP memerintah negara!

Lihat sahaja apa yang telah DAP lakukan di Perak semasa pemerintahan singkat mereka, bangsa manakah yang mendapat paling banyak keuntungan?

Bukan setakat parti DAP, malah parti PKR pun tidak berminat untuk mempertahankan hak-hak istimewa orang Melayu dan mereka juga tidak sensitif akan perasaan orang Melayu.

Contoh: Kenyataan Tian Chua semasa pertempuran di Lahad Datu di mana  9 perwira Melayu terkorban  demi mempertahankan kedaulatan negara.

Tindakan Teresa Kok membuang tulisan Jawi pada sebuah papan tanda jalan di Kuala Lumpur jelas menindas hak orang Melayu dalam memperkasakan tulisan Jawi, tulisan asal Bahasa Kebangsaan yang mesti dipelajari oleh semua kaun di Malaysia.

Lebih teruk lagi, tindakan pemimpin DAP itu memberi gambaran bahawa pada mereka, kedudukan tulisan Jawi lebih rendah berbanding kedudukan tulisan Cina dan Tamil!

Apakah ini contoh DAP memelihara hak orang Melayu?

Perkara 160 Perlembagaan Persekutuan mendefinisikan orang Melayu sebagai orang yang beragama Islam, maka dalam memelihara hak orang Melayu, agama Islam mesti dipelihara, di pertahankan dan diperjuangkan selaras dengan Perkara 3(1) yang meletakkan Islam sebagai agama bagi Persekutuan.

Apakah tindakan dan reaksi Pakatan DAP di dalam kes rampasan Bible, kes kalimah Allah, ahli politik bukan Islam berceramah di dalam surau dan masjid, cadangan pindaan Akta 355 dan sebagainya itu memelihara hak beragama orang Melayu?

Lim Kit Siang dan pemimpin bukan Islam lain DAP serta Pakatan DAP bukan setakat berkali-kali menghina Islam, malah dengan sesuka hati mencampuri urusan agama Islam walaupun ianya bertentangan dengan Perkara 11(3) Perlembagaan Persekutuan; inikah caranya untuk membela hak orang Melayu?

Sila cilck: Lim Kit Siang pernah dengan biaDAPnya mempertikai Surah Al-Baqarah.

Tony Pua DAP dengan biadap telah menghina Khutbah Jumaat pada 14 Februari 2014. (Sila baca di sini)

Teo Nie Ching (DAP) ialah diantara pemimpin bukan Islam Pakatan DAP yang jelas tidak menghormati agama Islam dengan berucap kepada para jemaah di ruang solat utama surau dan masjid, contoh yang lain ialah Xavier Jayakumar A/L Arulanandam, Sivarasa Rasiah dan sebagainya.

Ngeh Koo Ham pula sering mencampuri urusan orang Melayu dan agama Islam, contohnya mengatakan menurut Perlembagaan Persekutuan orang Melayu boleh murtad dan bebas memilih agama, soal sijil halal Old Town White Coffee, soal kalimah Allah dan banyak lagi.

(Sila click di sini untuk imej yang lebih besar)

Pakatan DAP dengan jelasnya menyokong agenda LGBT, contohnya semasa perhimpunan Bersih 4. (Sila baca di sini)

Malah, Ahli Parlimen DAP Bukit Bendera, Zairil yang walaupun mengaku beragama Islam telah berusaha menentang taraf, kedudukan dan bidang kuasa Mahkamah Syariah menurut Perkara 121(1A) Perlembagaan Persekutuan; khasnya yang menghalang Mahkamah Tinggi daripada membatalkan keputusan Mahkamah Syariah.

Begitu juga Dr. Ariffin Omar, seorang lagi pemimpin DAP yang walaupun mengaku beragama Islam, telah memberitahu Parlimen, “Apa salahnya kalau Penang hendak dijadikan Christian city?”

Malah pemimpin Islam PAN, PKR dan DAP bukan setakat berdiam diri, malah ada yang membela apabila pemimpin bukan Islam DAP dan PKR menghina Islam.

PAN yang mengaku kononnya ‘Islamik’, tidak boleh diharap langsung untuk membela Islam; malahan, mereka ‘ada’ Islam versi mereka sendiri, yang mirip kepada ideologi yang diperjuangkan oleh Penang Institute, puak-puak liberal (seperti SIS Forum Bhd, G25, Siti Zabedah Kasim dan ramai lagi) dan mereka yang menentang dasar negara yang memgamalkan Islam Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah.

Pemimpin Pakatan DAP termasuk peminpin PAN juga mahu duit zakat di bahagikan kepada orang-orang bukan Islam, sedangkan masih ramai lagi asnaf yang perlu dibantu.

Maka, janji Lim Kit Siang bahawa hak orang Melayu tetap terpelihara, malah akan dipertingkatkan jika ‘Pakatan Harapan-Bersatu’ memenangi Pilihan Raya Umum hanyalah menanam tebu di bibir mulut.

(Sila baca Perjanjian DAP, PKR, PAN, PPBM Untuk Meminda Perkara 3(1)? )

Semua itu hanyalah janji retorik untuk menutup pekung mereka demi untuk meraih undi orang Melayu untuk PRU 14 nanti.

Pindalah Perlembagaan DAP terlebih dahulu sebelum bercakap soal mempertahankan hak Melayu! 

---

Related posts:

1. Ngeh Koo Ham, Majlis Syura Ulama PAS And ‘Kalimah Allah’
2. Zairil Dakwa Tun M Mencadangkan Pindaan Semberono?
3. Menjawab Dr. Ariffin Omar: Apa salahnya kalau Penang hendak dijadikan Christian city?
4. Jawapan Kepada Kenyataan Mengelirukan Khalid Samad Tentang Pindaan Akta 355
5. Apa Nak Jadi Pada Tun M
6. Act 355: Another Baseless and Illogical Arguement from G25
7. Kerana Mudah Lupa, Tun M Kini Jadi Alat Puak Liberal Pengaruhi Melayu (Video)
8. Akta 355: Poster Dangkal SIS Forum Tentang Akta 355
9. Institusi Agama Fitnah G25 & Shad Faruqi? Biar Betul!
10. Old Town White Coffee Halal Certification And YB Ngeh Koo Ham
11. Is The Lahad Datu Incident A Conspiracy?
12. Is Muhyiddin Still “A Malay First”
13. Constitutionally Illiterate!
14. Surat Balas Tun M Tidak Menjawab Persoalan
15. Perjanjian DAP, PKR, PAN, PPBM Untuk Meminda Perkara 3(1)?
16. Tun Dr Mahathir, From A Statesman To A Street Demonstrator
17. Tony Pua Hina Khutbah Jumaat
18. What A Joke, Khalid Samad

Tun M: Jangan Menang Sorak, Kampung Tergadai

(Photo credit to Dr MIM)

 

It is clear that Tun Dr. Mahathir and his supporters including Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, who are demanding for the Prime Minister Najib to step down, are willing to do anything to achieve their goals.

In his desperate attempt, Tun Dr. Mahathir brought his troop including Tan Sri Muhyiddin who is still an UMNO man to team up with Lim Kit Siang, Ambiga and Maria Chin whose dreams are only to kill UMNO.

(Photo credit to Dr MIM)

 

What logical justification can Tun Dr. Mahathir gives about his latest move?

Mahathir was seen at Bersih’s illegal rally claiming that they are fighting for democracy; but is it democratic to force a legally elected leader to step down just because Tun wants him to step down?

This is actually an anarchy and not democracy!

What is the use of having general elections if people like Tun Dr. Mahathir and friends can just force the Prime Minister of Malaysia to step down by making some declaration?

As senior politicians Tun Dr. Mahathir and his troop can clearly see that what is happening in Egypt and Libya after the Arab Spring can also happen to us if they revolt against the legally elected government.

Indeed, they are forcing the government to spend the country’s resources to solve problems created by them when the resources should be spent on building our nation.

Please look at what is happening in Beirut, Lebanon, when the government is financially and politically weak; they cannot even solve the trash problems which has now turned into a river of trash in the middle of the city.

Do they want that to happen to us in Malaysia too?

Do they care about us?

It is hard to see that they actually care about what will happen to the people whom they claim that they are fighting for, but instead they are using the people for their own agendas.

Anarchist politics will only destroy our country because the same action will happen again and again and there will be no strong government to lead and take care of us.

Tun M and TMI vs Bukit Aman

The Malaysian Insider (TMI) reported that the police went to Tun Dr. Mahathir’s office in Kuala Lumpur on November 6, 2015.

It is understood that the police team, led by Supt Azham Othman had posed 45 questions to Dr Mahathir over alleged statements he made against the country’s leadership and other related issues including the Bersih 4 rally. – TMI

TMI also wrote that, “the authorities opened several investigation papers after reports were made against Dr Mahathir, Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said last month”.

Next, TMI reported that, “Dr Mahathir stays mum, up to police to consider arrest”.

And Tun M decided not to answer questions asked by the police.

“They asked questions and I said I will not answer. I don’t censor anything,” – Tun M (TMI)

Then the next day, on November 7, TMI again posted another article about Tun M questioning, “reports in government-linked newspapers reporting that the country was not heading into a financial crisis.”

TMI reported Tun M argued, “if everything is fine, why did Putrajaya arrest people for sabotaging the banking and financial system of the country”.

TMI also wrote that, “Dr Mahathir said there appear to be a loss of confidence in the government that was precipitated by the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal”.

He said there was “the inability to service debts, disappearance of money, cash in the private accounts of the PM, its subsequent disappearance, inability to explain US$100 million, the Budget 2016 monetary gifts, shrinking national resources, questionable use of EPF and KWAP funds, poor FDI, etc.” “So all cannot be well. Who is responsible? Cannot be some non entity! – Tun M (TMI).

Now in the first place, why didn’t Tun M answer the questions asked by the police when the next day he made more accusations about the PM?

If his accusations are true, why didn’t he tell the police everything he knows and give them all the evidences to support his words so that the police can take action and investigate the matter?

Or is it because he has no evidence?

He understands the law, so why haven’t he taken proper actions rather than giving speeches and talking about the same thing over and over again everyday without showing any concrete evidence?

And why did Tun M do not cooperate with the police who are actually doing their work?

What is he trying to prove when he told the reporters that he doesn’t care, “if anyone is going to arrest him”? 

Is anybody trying to imply that the police went there to arrest Tun M or sort of police abusing their power?

And it gets funnier when even Anwar Ibrahim from the Sungai Buloh Prison defended Tun M, saying that Tun M committed no crime.

Now, when the police received a report, they must investigate; but when they investigate, unfortunately people like Anwar blamed the police for doing what they have to do.

Now, does Anwar want to stop the police from doing their work?

As written in the first TMI’s article above, the police were there only to investigate, and not to arrest or to question Tun M because they accused Tun M committed a crime; but why must TMI brought up the possibilities of Tun be arrested?

Is Tun M, TMI and people around him trying to blame the police over this matter and saying that PM Najib uses the police to arrest innocent people who criticise the PM?

And another thing, why must Tun M be the judge and blame the authorities in the case of Khairuddin and Mathias Chang and not wait for the case to be judge in court?

Please stop tarnishing the reputation of other parties to make us look good or to prove that we are right.

I’m sad to see Tun M tarnishing his own good name and I hope Tun M will be given hidayah, amin.

Budget 2013

At 3:50 pm this afternoon, I watched our Prime Minister, Dato’ Sri Najib Razak tabled the Budget 2013 on television.

Dato’ Sri Haji Mohammad Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak tabling the Budget 2013, Friday September 28, 2012. Photo from Berita Harian,

It was held in the Parliament.

A view during the Budget 2013 tabling in the Parliament, Friday September 28, 2012.  Photo from Berita Harian,

During the Budget 2013 tabling, the Prime Minister spoke about how the government is going to spend the country’s money for the people in 2013.

But I don’t really understand what he says during the tabling.

Anyway one of the things that I understand is that he wanted to help the people in Malaysia to own houses.

Is it a good budget?

I do not know whether it is good or not.

So, I asked my father about it and he answered that the Budget 2013 is a good budget.

I think that deep in his heart, the Opposition Leader, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim also thinks that Budget 2013 is a good budget but he could not admit it to other people because it is Dato’ Sri Najib Razak’s idea, so he’ll say that his ideas are much better.