Please click for a bigger image:
Today I was shown an article from ‘Apa Kecoh-Kecoh’ that made me very sad and angry.
I really wonder why Ngeh Koo Ham likes to provoke the Malays and Islam?
“Ngeh Koo Ham 倪可汉 @ ngehkooham
@ Manifestogwl @ n_izzah @ anwaribrahim CONST Fed says up to age 18 foll Religion of Parents. Thereafter, he has freedom to choose.”
What Ngeh said is wrong because the above statement is against Islam and also Article 11 (1) is subjected to Article 11 (4).
Or is it true that PR is trying to abrogate Article 11 (4) as written by Suara Pakatan Rakyat?
Article 11 (1) says that every person has the right to profess and practice his own religion but subjected to clause 4 of the Article which says state law and, in respect of the Federal Territories, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among Muslims.
Apa Kecoh-Kecoh pointed out that Ngeh had forgotten the Article 160 (2) of the Federal Constitution that says that a Malay must be a Muslim, habitually speaks the Malay language, and adheres to Malay customs.
Please click for bigger image:
I am a Muslim and it is very sad to see how a non-Muslim leader dares to talk about Islam as if he has the authority to do so.
What will PAS say about Ngeh’s and Nurul Izzah’s statements?
Related Posts:
-
Old Town White Coffee Halal Certification And YB Ngeh Koo Ham
-
Peaceful Assembly Over ‘Innocence of Muslims’ Is A Waste Of Time But Bersih Is Not?
-
Nurul Izzah’s Full Speech Video At Subang Jaya Full Gospel Church
-
What Ibrahim Ali And Khalid Samad Say To Nurul Izzah’s Statement
-
Is PR Trying To Abrogate Article 11 (4)?
