The opposition parties tried hard to prove that Malaysia is a Secular State just because they want Malaysia to be a Secular State .
(Please read: Is Malaysia A Secular State?)
DAP Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo said that Malaysia is proven to be a secular state by referring to Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor.
As a lawyer he must understands that Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor is no longer a good law because it was decided before the coming into effect of Article 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution.
Furthermore, in Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor, Tan Sri Salleh Abbas did not say that Malaysia is a secular nation but Tan Sri Salleh Abbas only said that secular laws were used.
By the way, does Gobind Singh Deo understand what is a Secular State?
Wikipedia wrote that:
“A secular state is a concept of secularism, whereby a state or country purports to be officially neutral in matters of religion, supporting neither religion nor irreligion. A secular state also claims to treat all its citizens equally regardless of religion, and claims to avoid preferential treatment for a citizen from a particular religion/nonreligion over other religions/nonreligion. Secular states do not have a state religion (established religion) or equivalent, although the absence of a state religion does not necessarily mean that a state is fully secular; however, a true secular state should steadfastly maintain national governance without influence from religious factions; i.e. Separation of church and state.”
Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution says that:
“Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation”.
In Meor Atiqul Rahman v Fatimah Sihi and others, Judge Yang Arif Dato’ Mohd Noor Abdullah explained that:
“Islam ialah ugama bagi persekutuan tapi ugama-ugama lain boleh diamalkan dalam aman dan damai. Islam adalah ugama utama di antara ugama-ugama lain yang dianuti di negara seperti Kristian, Buddha, Hindu. Islam bukan setaraf dengan ugama lain. bukan duduk berganding bahu dengan agama lain atau berdiri sama sama tegak. Ia duduk di atas, berjalan dahulu, terletak di tempat medan, dan suaranya lantang kedengaran. Islam ibarat pokok jati. Tinggi, teguh, dan terang. Jika bukan sedemikian, Islam bukanlah ugama bagi persekutuan, tetapi adalah salah satu di antara beberapa ugama yang dianuti di wilayah ini, dan setiap orang sama-sama bebas mengamalkan mana-mana ugama yang dianuti. Tiada lebih di antara satu sama lain.”
And in the case of Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan, the then Chief Justice, Yang Amat Arif Tun Ahmad Fairus said:
“Islam itu bukan sahaja suatu himpunan dogma-dogma dan ritual-ritual tetapi ianya juga suatu cara hidup yang lengkap merangkumi semua bidang aktiviti manusia, persendirian dan awam, perundangan, politik, ekonomi, sosial, budaya, moral atau kehakiman etc.”
With those statements, it proves that Malaysia is not a Secular State because Malaysia has a state religion, that is Islam; and “secular states do not have a state religion”; therefore Malaysia is not officially neutral in matters of religion (as what was said in the ruling of Meor Atiqul Rahman v Fatimah Sihi and others) and “nonreligion” is against the first Rukun Negara or National Principles of Malaysia which says, “Kepercayaan Kepada Tuhan” or “Belief in God”.
How could a lawyer like MP Gobind Singh Deo forget Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution and the Rukun Negara?
And the DAP MP could only remember a small part of the case of Che’ Omar bin Che’ Soh v Public Prosecutor but forgot about more important cases like Meor Atiqul Rahman v Fatimah Sihi and others and Lina Joy v Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan.
Mr. Gobind Singh Deo, please be a good and responsible Malaysian citizen and please stop spinning stories and please respect the Federal Constitution.
Not everybody in Malaysia can be fooled by oppositions fairy tales.
Related Posts:
[…] Gobind Singh: Malaysia Is A Secular State – Another Fairy Tale? […]
LikeLike
[…] Gobind Singh: Malaysia Is A Secular State – Another Fairy Tale? […]
LikeLike
[…] That makes me wonder if Tawfik Ismail, who Free Malaysia Today (FMT) referred as “a prominent opponent of theocratic governance”, has ever read the Federal Constitution or understands the definition of the word secular. […]
LikeLike
[…] That makes me wonder if Tawfik Ismail, who Free Malaysia Today (FMT) referred as “a prominent opponent of theocratic governance”, has ever read the Federal Constitution or understands the definition of the word secular. […]
LikeLike
[…] yang dibanggakan oleh PKR, iaitu pemimpin tidak menghormati Islam, agama bagi negeri Selangor dan agama bagi negara Malaysia dan melanggar titah tuanku Sultan […]
LikeLike
[…] leaders especially from DAP, PKR, and PAN are still denying the truth, and arrogantly insist that Malaysia is a secular country and Islam is merely the official religion; which in reality is a baseless and a […]
LikeLike
[…] leaders especially from DAP, PKR, and PAN are still denying the truth, and arrogantly insist that Malaysia is a secular country and Islam is merely the official religion; which in reality is a baseless and a malicious […]
LikeLike
[…] by calling Malaysia a secular country, Tay slanders and challenges both the Federal Constitution and the definition of […]
LikeLike
[…] by calling Malaysia a secular country, Tay slanders and challenges both the Federal Constitution and the definition of […]
LikeLike
[…] calling Malaysia a secular country, Boo Su-Lyn slanders and challenges both the Federal Constitution and the definition of […]
LikeLike
[…] action by them is consistent with their stance that Malaysia is a secular country whereas Malaysia is not and has never been a secular […]
LikeLike
[…] could a country be constitutionally a secular state when its Federal Constitution which is the Supreme Law of the land has declared that Islam is the religion of the country […]
LikeLike
[…] could a country be constitutionally a secular state when its Federal Constitution which is the Supreme Law of the land has declared that Islam is the religion of the country […]
LikeLike
[…] What is the problem with some non-Muslims when the Muslims tries to strengthen the teaching of Islam in an Islamic country? […]
LikeLike
[…] is her intention to ask for the Article that protects Islam, the Religion of the Federation as stated in the Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution of M… to be […]
LikeLike
[…] Datuk Farida mentioned the Quran, I think that she is talking about liberalism and pluralism of religion. For a person who believes in pluralism of religion, all religions are the same while a person who […]
LikeLike
[…] Datuk Farida mentioned the Quran, I think that she is talking about liberalism and pluralism of religion. For a person who believes on pluralism of religion, all religions are the same while a person who […]
LikeLike
[…] 3(1), 11(4), 12(2), 37(1) and 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution proves that Malaysia is an Islamic country, in fact, that the word ‘secular’ has never been written in the Federal […]
LikeLike
[…] 3(1), 11(4), 12(2), 37(1) and 121(1A) of the Federal Constitution proves that Malaysia is an Islamic country, in fact, that the word ‘secular’ has never been written in the Federal […]
LikeLike
[…] wrote a few post on why Malaysia is not a secular country; please read, “Gobind Singh: Malaysia Is A Secular State – Another Fairy Tale?” and “Is Malaysia A […]
LikeLike
[…] wrote a few post on why Malaysia is not a secular country; please read, “Gobind Singh: Malaysia Is A Secular State – Another Fairy Tale?” and “Is Malaysia A […]
LikeLike