SUARAM’s Candlelight Vigil – Who Actually Supports RACISM?

SUARAM’s candlelight vigil at Esplanade, Penang. (The photo is from Generasi Pejuang Bangsa/ GPB).

Suara Rakyat Malaysia’s, (SUARAM) Candlelight Vigil was held at the Esplanade in Penang on May 13, 2013.

(sejarahmelayu.blogspot.com/2013/05/hot-melayu-pr-ppinang-engkar-fatwa.html)

I would like to say three things about the above picture:

1. There is a man wearing Muslim attire in the photo - Didn’t he knows that Muslims should not join Candlelight Vigil?

2. The candles on the ground forms the sentence, “TOLAK RASISM!!!” - Who are they referring to?

3. The second banner from left says; “APA WE MAO? Bersih Lah” - Why did they use the word ‘MAO’ when they should know that the right word in Bahasa Melayu is ‘mahu’; so they actually humiliates the Malays, especially when the word ‘Mao’ is synonym to Mao Zedong, a communist leader from China.

GPB wrote that:

“Turut hadir beberapa anggota Dewan Undangan Negeri (ADUN), termasuk (Sungai Puyu) dan Dr Afif Bahardin (Seberang Jaya).”

I am sad to see Muslims who do not understand that Muslims cannot take part in any Candlelight Vigil activity and PAS who supports SUARAM does not care to warn the PR’s Muslims about this.

(e-fatwa.gov.my/fatwa-kebangsaan/hukum-penglibatan-orang-islam-dalam-aktiviti-candlelight-vigil)

And in referring to them using the word ‘MAO’ instead of ‘mahu’, I want to ask SUARAM, now who are the ones who are actually racist?

It is easy to say bad things about others but it is hard to admit our own mistakes and for SUARAM, they are always perfect and like all the PR leaders, members and supporters – BN is never right and they would try to blame BN for whatever mistake that they ever made. 

 Muzakarah Jawatankuasa Fatwa Majlis Kebangsaan Bagi Hal Ehwal Ugama Islam Malaysia Kali Ke-88 yang bersidang pada 2 Oktober 2009 telah membincangkan Hukum Penglibatan Orang Islam Dalam Aktiviti Candlelight Vigil. Muzakarah telah memutuskan bahawa:

1. Islam melarang umatnya daripada terlibat dalam apa jua amalan yang bersifat ritual atau upacara agama bukan Islam.

2. Umat Islam dilarang menyertai aktiviti Candlelight Vigil kerana ia mengandungi unsur-unsur tasyabbuh dengan agama bukan Islam yang akan menjejaskan akidah umat Islam.

GE13: So It Is True That PKR Is After A Revolution?

My big sister’s, Aeshah Adlina Weblog received an ‘interesting’ comment from ‘PKR 4 the win’ on her post, “Pakatan’s new Malaysia flag: Not a copycat? Turning Malaysia to a Republic?”

‘PKR 4 the win’ submitted this comment at 10:53 pm on 2013/04/25:

“President Soekarno was right when he said that malaysia is a country without ideology and identity.

There was no revolution and no struggle for independence in malaysia. The country was not created by the people, it was created by a deal between britain and sultans.

Malaysia does not have a state ideology and no real constitution. This country exclusively consists of deals and compromises. (just like that american style flag)

This injust corrupt monarchist regime can not survive if the people get a certain level of education and access to independent information.

It is just a matter of time until malaysia becomes a democratic republic, because even the brain of the most stupid conservative racist religious idiot will at some point develop if the general level of education rises.

weapon of BN: fear, racism and stupidity

weapon of PKR: education, information and justice”

How interesting!

“President Soekarno was right when he said that malaysia is a country without ideology and identity.”

First Soekarno was a leftist that supported socialist and communism ideologies.

Wikipedia says that:

“The early 1960s saw Sukarno veering Indonesia to the left by providing support and protection to the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) at the expense of the military and Islamists. He also embarked on a series of aggressive foreign policies under the rubric of anti-imperialism, with aid from Soviet Union and China.”

It is wrong for Soekarno to say that Malaysian has no ideology and identity.

I think Soekarno said that just because he did not agree with Malaysia’s political systems because Malaysia never and until today does not believe in socialism and communism.

“Malaysia does not have a state ideology and no real constitution. This country exclusively consists of deals and compromises. (just like that american style flag)”

Uncle Naser Disa taught me that Malaysia is an Islamic country and Malaysia has a very strong Federal Constitution that protects the people and the rights of the King and Sultans to protect Islam as the religion of the country.

I wonder if the commenter ever study our Federal Constitution before commenting.

Regarding, “just like that american style flag”; does it means that the commenter is against the Malaysian flag, ‘Jalur Gemilang’?

And does that means that the commenter is admitting that PKR and its allies want to change the Malaysian flag to a new flag which they called ‘Sang Saka Malaya’?

Those people accused that ‘Jalur Gemilang’ is similar to the flag of the United States but can’t they see that their ‘Sang Saka Malaya’ is almost the same as the Singaporean and the Indonesian flag?

The design of Sang Saka Malaya is also similar to the design and colours of socialist and the communist flags.

Please read:

http://ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com/2012/09/07/jalur-gemilang-our-flag-our-pride/

The commenter also complained and not happy about the monarch.

Complaining about the monarch means that the commenter wants Malaysia to be a republic country because without the king, Malaysia will become a republic country, and even a secular country which Malaysia is not and never has been.

Please read:

http://ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com/2012/09/03/a-new-malaysian-flag-a-sign-of-prs-revolution/

According to a very senior lawyer, Hj Mahamad Naser bin Disa, the word secular doesn’t exist in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia; and the Article 3 (1) says that:

“Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.”

In fact judge Tun Salleh Abbas said that Malaysia only uses secular rules and not a secular country so that means the commenter is against the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

“It is just a matter of time until malaysia becomes a democratic republic”.

Time for Malaysia to become a democratic and republic country?

Thank you to the commenter for showing the true colours of PKR.

Now the cat is out of the bag, the commenter has revealed PKR’s big secret that is PKR does not want the king and is after a revolution or ‘Malaysian Spring’ to turn Malaysia into a left wings, secular, republic country that supports the same ideas as Soekarno.

Pecah tembelang PKR, dah terbongkarlah rahsia PKR.

The commenter also wrote:

“weapon of PKR: education, information and justice”

“JUSTICE”???

If PKR is fair, how can CheguBard said that he was tricked by PKR leader, Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim as was recorded in a video? Please click here for the video

And how can a person speaks about justice in PKR when PKR leaders lied about their dreams to change our Federal Constitution and to turn Malaysia into a secular and a republic country?

Can a cheater or liar talks about JUSTICE?

And I also wonder why this commenter and PKR’s leaders, members and supporters love revolutions, wars and violence that they think all countries need revolutions and bloodsheds to be a great country?

 

That is why we should not vote for PAKATAN RAKYAT!

Vote for BARISAN NASIONAL!

GE13: “TUMBANG PAKATAN!” – PAS’s Latest War Cry Slogan

During the PRU13 candidate nomination in Marang, Terengganu this morning, PAS supporters grouped together in the middle of the road chanting words of war cry to taunt the Barisan Nasional supporters.

Let us listen to what they say:

I really love this part of their war cry:

Tumbang, Tumbang ! TUMBANG PAKATAN !

That shows how confused PAS supporters are that they even shouted, “TUMBANG PAKATAN!”

This reminds me of this ‘interesting’ photo during the KL 112:

There can’t be four qiblat in the Merdeka Stadium. So, which direction is the real qiblat? (Photo from Paneh Miang)

So, no wonder today they are chanting for, “TUMBANG PAKATAN”

That is why we should not vote PAKATAN RAKYAT!

Vote for BARISAN NASIONAL!

Credit to Uncle Din Turtle: http://dinturtle.blogspot.com/2013/04/hot-marang-kumpulan-sorak-pas-tersasul.html

Ustaz Azhar Idrus: “Islam Dan Kristian Bertuhankan Allah?”

Is this really written by Ustaz Azhar Idrus? Screenshot from Paneh Miang.

I do not really understand the above conversation but I was shocked to read the part written by Ustaz Azhar Idrus saying:

“Islam dan Kristian bertuhankan Allah…Isa adalah Nabi umat Kristian dan Nabi umat Islam..”

When Ustaz Azhar wrote that both Islam and Christian worship Allah; does he mean that both  Islam and Christian share the same god that is Allah?

That statement is totally wrong and it is an example of Pluralism of Religion.

Christian’s god is not Allah; Muslims and Christian do not share the same god.

Is Ustaz Azhar confused because Lim Guan Eng suggested the Christians to use the word “Allah” in the Malay version of bible to refer to the Christian’s god or gods? (Please read: PAS Says, “Yes” For The Word “Allah” In The Malay Version Bible)

Ustaz Azhar always says that UMNO is really bad because UMNO do not fight for Islam and Muslims must not vote for UMNO. (Pease read: Ustaz Azhar Idrus, A PAS Candidate for PRU 13?)

So now if this screenshot is real, who are the better Muslims?

That is why the Christians in Malaysia are not allowed to call their god Allah as what the Pakatan Rakyat wanted because some people may get confused. (Please watch: Video: Naser Disa Polemik Isu Kalimah Allah)

And the Pakatan Rakyat supporters are always confused; please read: Himpunan KL112′s Most Popular Photo.

Or does he really believe that both Islam and Christian worship Allah?

What will PAS leaders say about this as Ustaz Azhar is PAS’s favourite religious speaker?

Can we trust PAS and Pakatan Rakyat to take care of our country?

*Please read: ‘Azhar Idrus Mesti Bersumpah’ by Paneh Miang*

Related articles

• Ngeh Koo Ham, Majlis Syura Ulama PAS And ‘Kalimah Allah’ (ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com)
• PAS Says, “Yes” For The Word “Allah” In The Malay Version Bible. (ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com)
• Interesting Videos Of HKR #KL112
• Did Lim Guan Eng Said The Malays Are Moron?

Pakatan Rakyat, Pluralism, Socialism And Revolusion

In Penang, a small group of people had attended a ‘Holy Book Reading’ session yesterday.

Among them was Mislina Mustaffa who had earlier participated in other illegal demonstrations organised by the oppositions such as the ‘Occupy Dataran Merdeka’ and the’ KL112′.

From Occupy Dataran Merdeka, to the HKR #KL112 and now the ‘Holy Book reading’. Thank you Sel 13, Cucu Tok selampit and info 4 the truth for the photos.

I don’t know which holy books they were reading because I was not there.

Anyway I saw a lady wearing hijab in the photos. 

I wonder; if she is a Muslim, does she understand what she was doing?

A part of the people who attended the event.

But reading the sign below, maybe she does not understand …

I wonder if they wrote this sign to tell that they are confused … 

This is part of Pluralism of Religions and for the Muslims, this is not the right way  to respect other religions.

And there was a sign in one of the photos below that said …

“Read it, NOT BURN IT!!

We RESPECT other RELIGIONS!!”

Who wrote this sign and why?

What issue are they referring to, and who are they accusing as the bad person?

(Please click the photos for larger image)

Who are these people?

And look at the words written on the man’s t-shirt, ‘socialism’ and ‘revolt’. (Please read: KL112: Is PR After A Revolution? and A New Malaysian Flag – A Sign Of PR’s Revolution?

So are they part of those groups who want to start a revolution and support socialism?

Socialism has lots of similarities to communism.

So, is this a part of the oppositions’ plans to make people hate the Muslims and UMNO?

So, what will PAS leaders say about this?

Can we trust PR to uphold our Federal Constitution especially Article 3(1)?

Video: Naser Disa Polemik Isu Kalimah Allah

Please click here for my post on Uncle Naser’s speech, ‘Selangor’s MB Must Obey The Sultan Or Resign – Naser Disa‘.

Related articles

• Ngeh Koo Ham, Majlis Syura Ulama PAS And ‘Kalimah Allah’ (ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com)
• PPMM’s NGI Round Table Discussion On UPR Human Rights Council 2013 (ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com)

Selangor’s MB Must Obey The Sultan Or Resign – Naser Disa

Yesterday I attended the Forum Islam Dan Cabaran Semasa – Polemik Isu Kalimah Allah at the Auditorium Utama, Universiti Islam Antarabangsa.

(Please click here for the full video of his speech: ‘Video: Naser Disa Polemik Isu Kalimah Allah’)

I  think Uncle Naser Disa’s speech was the most interesting because as a lawyer he always explains issues according to the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

Uncle Naser said that according to the Federal Constitution, all politicians and all Malaysians must obey the decisions and the decrees made by the Sultans or the royal leaders of Malaysia on the ‘kalimah Allah’ issue.

However, the opposition parties, Pakatan Rakyat challenged the decree made by the Sultans that prohibited the word Allah from being used by non-Muslim to refer to their gods.

Uncle Naser went on saying that if the politicians failed to respect the Sultans’ decree on this matter, their nominations as the candidates in the coming general election should not be accepted because according to Section 298A of the Penal Code what they did is against the law.

And the Selangor’s Menteri Besar or the Chief Minister of Selangor and his excos should resign from their posts if they still cannot obey the supreme leader of Selangor, the Duli Yang Maha Mulia Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah Alhaj Ibni Almarhum Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah Alhaj.

As I wrote in, ‘PAS Says, “Yes” For The Word “Allah” In The Malay Version Bible‘, I think that the opposition parties do not understand Article 3(1) and 11(4) of the Federal Constitution, so Uncle Naser Disa is right; those who fail to understand and respect the law and the Federal Constitution should not be accepted as our leaders.

Related articles:

• Kalimah Allah: Pakatan Rakyat Violated the Federal Constitution (aimanamani.wordpress.com)
• PAS Says, “Yes” For The Word “Allah” In The Malay Version Bible. (ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com)
• Ngeh Koo Ham, Majlis Syura Ulama PAS And ‘Kalimah Allah’ (ahmadalikarim.wordpress.com)

Ngeh Koo Ham, Majlis Syura Ulama PAS And ‘Kalimah Allah’

Please click the above image to read the Sinar Harian’s article.

Today Sinar Harian (SN) publishes an article about YB Ngeh Koo Ham’s statement on the ‘kalimah Allah’ issue.

The ‘kalimah Allah’ issue, became a hot topic again after DAP’s Chief Minister of Penang, Lim Guan Eng’s statement about using the word “Allah” in the Malay version of bible.

Ngeh told SN that he agrees with PAS’s Majlis Syura Ulama that ‘kalimah Allah’ is universal and can be quoted by everybody.

SN wrote, “Beliau berkata, setiap agama mempercayai bahawa wujudnya satu tuhan iaitu ALLAH cuma setiap agama berbeza perspektif dalam mempercayainya” or he quoted, all religions believe that there is one god which is Allah but they believe in Him in different prespectives.

SN reported YB Ngeh saying:

“Saya yakin kebanyakan agama di dunia meyakini tuhan itu satu tetapi konsep ketuhanan itu sedikit berbeza. Saya juga bersetuju bahawa bukan Islam tidak boleh menggunakan kalimah ALLAH untuk maksud yang lain.”  

or

 ”I am confident that most of the religions in this world believe that god is one but their concepts of god is slightly different. I also agree that the word ALLAH can’t be used by the non-Muslims for other meanings.”

His statements made me sad and surprised.

So does Ngeh mean that all religions believe in the same god that is Allah or the Muslim’s Allah is the same as other gods of other religions?

Is Ngeh referring to Pluralism of Religion?

If he means that; then he is totally wrong; for in Islam (which is the religion of this country as in Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution), we do not believe in Pluralism of Religion.

The DAP’s Perak Chairman always made untrue statements about Islam when he is not a Muslim and does not understand Islam.

PAS should advise its ally …but PAS leaders themselves seems to be very confused over lots of issues regarding Islam.

They put all the blame on UMNO or Umno related medias for what ever mistakes they made including this issue!

So, can we trust the oppositions?

Related articles

• PAS Says, “Yes” For The Word “Allah” In The Malay Version Bible.
• Ngeh Tweeted, “Malays Has Freedom To Choose Religion
• Old Town White Coffee Halal Certification And YB Ngeh Koo Ham
• Peaceful Assembly Over ‘Innocence of Muslims’ Is A Waste Of Time But Bersih Is Not?
• Nurul Izzah’s Full Speech Video At Subang Jaya Full Gospel Church
• What Ibrahim Ali And Khalid Samad Say To Nurul Izzah’s Statement
• Is PR Trying To Abrogate Article 11 (4)?

Kenapa Angka 112? Ada Agenda Kristian?

(Karim’s Blog) Perhimpunan Bersih 4.0 semalam, atau yang “rebranding”nya berbunyi KL#112, telah berlalu pergi. Tercapai atau tidak niat dan hasrat mereka untuk mengumpul sejuta orang itu tidak mahu kita bicara di sini. Sepertimana tajuk di atas, kenapa angka yang dipilih untuk menandai perhimpunan ini ialah 112?

Ianya berlangsung pada 12hb Januari 2013. Sepatutnya angka 121 yang dipilih. Bukankah setahun yang lalu angka 901 digunakan untuk perhimpunan di Jalan Duta pada hari keputusan pembicaraan Anwar, iaitu 9hb Januari 2012. Dengan mengguna format yang digunapakai di Malaysia (bukan di Amerika Syarikat) angka yang logik diguna untuk perhimpunan semalam ialah 121 atau 1201.

Dengan sedikit carian dalam internet kita dapat temui angka 112 adalah suatu angka yang ada kaitan dengan Bible Kristian dari susun atur angka dalam bahasa Hebrew yang memberi pengertian Tuhan mereka. Kajian numerologi dari susunan abjad dari 22 abjad dalam bahasa Hebrew ini memberikan pengertian angka 112 itu bermaksud “The LORD God” atau YHVH Elohim [YHVH = Yahaweh (atau Jehovah), inilah nama yang sebetulnya untuk Tuhan Kristian, bukannya Allah, perkara ini dibicara dalam posting Paderi Indonesia akui kalimah Allah hanya untuk orang Islam - klik untuk baca]

Of great significance is the fact that the number 112, the order number of the triangle, is the Hebrew gematria of JEHOVAH-ELOHIMor LORD God.

The Triangle is the 112^th triangular number 6328 and 112 is the value of Jehovah-Elohim (LORD God) and 6328 in ascending digits is 2368, the value of Jesus Christ. (http://www.fivedoves.com)

Dalam pada kalimah Allah hendak mereka hina dengan menyamakan Allah Yang Maha Esa dengan Tuhan Triniti mereka , puak-puak gereja mengajak rakyat Malaysia berhimpun mengagungkan “The LORD God” mereka. Umat Islam kita berpecah dalam isu kalimah Allah – dalam pada sesetengah mereka membenarkan puak gereja mengguna kalimah Allah mereka inilah pulak yang mengagungkan pula angka yang mengangkat nama Tuhan Kristian ini. Astaghfirullah

Apakah ada dalam pakar strategi perhimpunan semalam yang membawa agenda Kristian?

Wallahu’alam

Paderi Indonesia akui kalimah Allah hanya untuk orang Islam

12 January, 2013 in Islam, maklumat | 1 comment

KUALA LUMPUR 11 Jan. – Seorang paderi dari Indonesia, Jahja Iskandar mengakui bahawa kalimah Allah adalah khas untuk umat Islam.

Perkara itu didedahkan Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan, Datuk Wan Zahidi Wan Teh yang merujuk kepada perakuan di dalam buku tulisan paderi tersebut iaitu Mengapa Nama Yahweh Semakin Popular.

Katanya, berdasarkan buku itu, Jahja memberitahu bahawa kata yang tepat bagi nama Tuhan sembahan orang Kristian berasaskan bahasa asli perjanjian lama, iaitu Ibrani (bahasa digunakan orang Yahudi) ialah Elohim.

Menurut Wan Zahidi, jika diterjemah ke bahasa Arab, maka kata yang tepat bagi menggantikan Elohim ialah Ilah bukan Allah, berasaskan terjemahan paling awal ke bahasa Arab iaitu Inskripsi Zabad pada tahun 512.

“Sehubungan itu, Yayasan Lentera Bangsa yang diasaskan oleh Jahja telah menerbitkan kitab suci Indonesia Literal Translation (KS-ILT) yang mana terjemahan itu tidak lagi tertera kalimah Allah, sebaliknya menggunakan Elohim sebagai nama sembahan orang Kristian.

Laporan di atas diambil dari Utusan Malaysia.

Baca teks penuh dari Jabatan Mufti Wilayah Persekutuan di sini (KLIK)

PAS Says, “Yes” For The Word “Allah” In The Malay Version Bible.

The Sultan of Selangor has expressed his shock and regret, and the Sultan is very disappointed over the statement made by DAP’s Chief Minister of Penang, Lim Guan Eng about using the word “Allah” in the Malay version of bible.

It was reported that, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah had called for an emergency meeting with members of the Selangor Islamic Affairs Council (MAIS), Selangor mufti as well as high-ranking officials of MAIS and Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (JAIS) on Jan 6 over the matter.

Mais secretary Datuk Mohd Misri Idris said in a statement Tuesday that, ”The Sultan of Selangor has made a decision and decreed that the word Allah is a sacred word specific for Muslims and prohibited to be used by any non-Muslim religion in Selangor as stated in a fatwa and gazetted on Feb 18, 2010.”

I am very proud and happy to know that the Sultan of Selangor is a very good leader who we can trust to protect the word Allah from being used by the non-Muslim to refer to their gods.

I am very sad but not surprised on PAS president, Haji Hadi Awang’s and PKR’s Anwar Ibrahim’s stand on the issue.

After all, I do not think that the opposition parties understand Article 3(1) and 11(4) of the Federal Constitution.

Please read:

1. Seminar Mendaulatkan Islam Agama Negara

2. Is PR Trying To Abrogate Article 11 (4)?

PAS leaders and members said that UMNO leaders and members are unIslamic but just look at what their leaders are doing.

I just cannot understand how PAS members who are all Muslims can accept such humiliation to Islam and still think that they are better Muslims than others.

Now I understand how important it is to have Sultans to protect the Malays and Islam. (Please read: Sultan Not Invited To Selangor Merdeka Celebration, Who’s Fault?)